Basis of the Plaintiff’s Case? “GPD was a Psychopath!!!”?

OK, I am not “the smartest person in the room” but it seems that a basic gist of “Personal Prosperity”‘s case to the Hawaii Supreme Court (Circuit Court, Family Court, ad naseum), is that the marriage of Geri Cvitanovich Dubie (owner of Personal Prosperity) should be put aside because either 1) George Patrick “Daniel” Dubie (GPD) was still married to a French Canadian or 2) he was a “psychopath” who exercised undo influence upon her and thus she could not be responsible for her actions….

So to consider the “psychopath” argument from a lay perspective, a web Psychopath test is pasted at the end of the post. It strikes me as remarkably self serving that the legal team that mocked and silenced reports of his misdeeds during his life, now purport to competently conduct a psychological post-mortem on GPD. The very tactic, steeped in a revisionist denial of the enabling roles played by the plaintiff’s team, seems to smack of psychopathology. Even more troubling from a larger social perspective, many of the dangerous traits that define “psychopath”s appear to be over represented in the upper echelons of certain professions. The very name and behaviour of Personal Prosperity together with what I have read of the MLM world, as well as the million dollar law firm that appears to have done PP’s bidding (both to squelch reports of GPD’s misdeeds and now to plead for legal relief from the outcomes of GPD’s actions), could arguably indicate many of these traits. Specifically objectionable to me is the cruel and vicious abuse of power to manipulate the legal process and _legally compel_ sexual assault victims to recount details of rape or assault as a part (under oath and videotaped) of allowable “discovery” ostensibly for the benefit of the same plaintiff that had knowledge of these reports 10 years ago yet chose to ignore and silence them. If this is building up to public testimony in a trial, I find that as horrifying and damaging as sexual assault. It is beyond words that victims who have reconstructed their lives and marched on could be required to publicly testify and themselves as well as their families be destroyed in such a capricious fashion to appease the monolithic power driven hunt for money by the wealthy elite. I condemn such behaviour of evidence of obscene pyschopatholgy. So I specifically challenge the plaintiff and her legal team to consider their scores on the following:

2. Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?
3. Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?
4. Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?
5. Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?
6. Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?
8. Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?
10. Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?
12. Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?
15. Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?
17. Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

So, back to GPD. I have worked very hard for 12 years to deconstruct the web of lies that I think ultimately cost him his life and find that man behind the curtain. Simple answers are usually wrong, I do not believe in cartoon pictures to convey the reality of a human being. I have no qualms at condemning misdeeds. After discovering his complex brain tumor scam and seeing through at least some of his other scams, I asked him why he would be so cruel and wondered as to the basis of his willingness to lie, manipulate, intimidate others, and physically hurt others. When I challenged him on this first told me his motto was “Live and let die”. I told him that was not at all in keeping with his claim to be living out the life of the Buddha or seeking enlightenment. He then said that I needed to have faith in his “plan” and that his targets were also dishonest greed-driven manipulators in the MLM pyramid scheme world. I admit that his answer surprised me. But again seeing the cruelty of the million dollar legal team assembled to prove that George Patrick Dubie was a full fledged psychopath, prompts me to challenge them to take this test honestly and see how they stack up.

“Lets consider the core questions:
The following questionnaire is based on research and experiences of socialised psychopaths. For each trait, decide if it applies to the person you suspect may be a socialised psychopath, fully, partially or not at all.

1. Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?
2. Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?
3. Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?
4. Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?
5. Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?
6. Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?
7.Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?
8. Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?
9. Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?
10. Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?
11. As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?
12. Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?
13. Are they quick to lose their temper?
14. Are they sexually promiscuous?
15. Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?
16.Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?
17. Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?
18. Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Advertisement